how many calories do your steps burn?
For a 70 kg adult of average height, 10,000 steps at an everyday pace come to about 245 kcal above resting — or 368 kcal in total, if you count what the body would have burned anyway. Those are two different numbers for the same walk, and knowing which one you are looking at explains most of the arguments people have with their watch.
Steps to calories, by weight
Large figure: energy above resting — the number a watch calls active energy. Small figure: total energy, which is what most calculators on the web give you. Everyday pace, height 170 cm.
| weight | 1,000 | 2,000 | 5,000 | 7,000 | 10,000 | 15,000 | 20,000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 55 kg121 lb | 1929 gross | 3958 gross | 96144 gross | 135202 gross | 193289 gross | 289433 gross | 385578 gross |
| 70 kg154 lb | 2537 gross | 4974 gross | 123184 gross | 172257 gross | 245368 gross | 368551 gross | 490735 gross |
| 85 kg187 lb | 3045 gross | 6089 gross | 149223 gross | 208312 gross | 298446 gross | 446669 gross | 595893 gross |
| 100 kg220 lb | 3553 gross | 70105 gross | 175263 gross | 245368 gross | 350525 gross | 525788 gross | 7001050 gross |
Worked out with the MET method and the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities; the formula and its sources are below.
Work it out for yourself
Your own weight, height and pace. Height matters because it sets the length of a step, and the length of a step sets how fast you are actually going.
How many steps burn 100, 300, 500 or 1000 calories?
The same arithmetic read backwards, counting energy above resting. These numbers are larger than most people expect, and that is the honest part of them.
| to burn | 55 kg | 70 kg | 85 kg | 100 kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 kcal | 5,195 | 4,082 | 3,361 | 2,857 |
| 300 kcal | 15,584 | 12,245 | 10,084 | 8,571 |
| 500 kcal | 25,974 | 20,408 | 16,807 | 14,286 |
| 1000 kcal | 51,948 | 40,816 | 33,613 | 28,571 |
Why your watch shows a smaller number
The standard formula is kcal per minute = MET × 3.5 × weight in kg ÷ 200. One MET is what your body uses sitting still, so that formula includes resting energy — it answers how much did this hour of my life cost.
An Apple Watch Move ring, and the activeEnergyBurned value that Apple Health
keeps, answer a different question: how much did I spend above sitting still.
Subtract one MET and you convert one into the other. At a moderate pace the total figure
is about 1.36 times the active one — which is exactly the size of the gap
people notice between a calculator they found and the ring on their wrist.
Neither is wrong. They are answers to two different questions, and almost no calculator says which one it is giving you.
What the pace does
| pace | speed | MET | time | kcal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| stroll80/min | 2.1 mph3.4 km/h | 2.8code 17152 | 125 min | 276429 gross |
| everyday walk100/min | 2.6 mph4.2 km/h | 3code 17170 | 100 min | 245368 gross |
| brisk130/min | 3.4 mph5.5 km/h | 3.8code 17190 | 77 min | 264358 gross |
Two things in that table surprise people. First, walking briskly does not multiply the calories of a fixed number of steps — it mostly saves time. Second, a stroll can cost slightly more total energy than a brisk walk over the same steps: very slow walking is less economical, and the extra minutes outweigh the lower rate.
The MET values come from the 2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities, and the activity codes are printed in the table so you can check them: 17152 for a slow pace, 17170 for 2.5 mph, 17190 for a moderate pace, 17200 for brisk walking for exercise.
Why weight matters more than anything else
Body weight enters the formula as a straight multiplier, and it dominates. In a study of 224 adults, weight alone accounted for around 60 % of the variation in the energy cost of walking, with a correlation of 0.775 against calories per mile. A 100 kg adult burns about 1.43 times what a 70 kg adult burns over the same walk.
Which is why a calculator that asks only for steps cannot be right for you. It has to pick someone, and that someone is usually a 70 kg adult.
Does a hill change it?
More than pace does. The ACSM walking equation adds a term for grade: VO₂ = 0.1 × speed + 1.8 × speed × grade + 3.5, with speed in metres per minute. A 5 % incline at a moderate pace raises the cost of walking by roughly a third. Stairs are steeper still, which is why the same number of steps up a hill and along a street are not the same walk at all.
How accurate is any of this?
Calories are the weakest number in fitness tracking, and it is worth saying plainly. Heart rate on a modern smartwatch is well validated — errors of about 4 to 5 % against a clinical ECG. Energy is not: in a Stanford comparison of seven wearables, the error in energy expenditure never fell below 20 % for any device tested.
A formula does worse still, because it knows only your weight, your pace and the clock. It cannot see your fitness, your gait, the wind, the bag you are carrying or the hill. Use these numbers as a scale, not as a measurement.
What Angel Step shows
The quiet line under the number in Angel Step is the active energy that Apple Health already holds, measured by your iPhone or your Apple Watch — not our own formula. Only when Health has nothing for the day does the app fall back to an estimate of 0.04 kcal per step, which is close to the total figure for a 75 kg adult and deliberately cautious.
That follows the same rule as the step count itself: one number, from one source. The full explanation of where the number comes from is on why your step counts don't match, and the distances behind the same steps are on how far is that many steps.
One trap worth knowing
A step is one foot landing. A stride is a full cycle — two steps. Half the calculators on the web quietly use one word for the other, and are wrong by a factor of two. Everything on this page counts single steps, and the step length used is 0.413 × your height, which is the ratio that matches measured step lengths within a centimetre or two.
Nothing here is medical advice, and none of it is a target. It is arithmetic about walking.